11 de agosto de 2015

dsfgsgsdgdsf


I smoked too many cigarettes, sipped too much Highland Park and let Bessie Smith tell me just how bad men were. For once thin afternoon sun shone on Glasgow; the last traces of winter just a distant memory. Old Joe started up “Just One Cornetto” in the shop downstairs. I didn’t have a case, and I didn’t care.
It was Easter weekend, and all was right with the world.
I should have known it was too good to last.
I heard him coming up the stairs. Sherlock Holmes could have told you his height, weight, shoe-size and nationality from the noise he made. All I knew was that he was either ill or very old; he’d taken the stairs like he was climbing a mountain with a Sherpa on his back.
He rapped on the outside door.
Shave and a haircut, two bits.
“Come in. Adams Massage Services is open for business.”
At first I thought it was someone wandering in off the street. He was unkempt, unshaven, eyes red and bleary. He wore an old brown wool suit over a long, out of shape cardigan and his hair stood out from his scalp in strange clumps. I’ve rarely seen a man more in need of a drink.
Or a meal.
He was so thin as to be almost skeletal, the skin on his face stretched tight across his cheeks. I was worried that if I made him smile his face might split open like an over-ripe fruit.
“Are you Adams?” he said as he came in. He turned out to be younger than I’d first taken him for, somewhere in his fifties at a guess, but his mileage was much higher. “Jim at the Twa Dugs said you might be able to help me.”
I waved him in.
“It’s about time Jim started calling in some of the favors I owe him. Sit down Mr…?”
“Duncan. Ian Duncan.”
He sat, perched at the front of the chair, as if afraid to relax. His eyes flickered around the room, never staying long on anything, never looking straight at me.
“Smoke?” I asked, offering him the packet.
He shook his head.
“It might kill me,” he said.
I lit up anyway… a smell wafted from the man, a thick oily tang so strong that even the pungent Camels didn’t help much.
Time for business.
“So what can I do for you Mr. Duncan?”
“I’m going to die sometime this weekend. I need you to stop them.”
I stared back at him.


fgdgdg




Designing the User Interface of the Future Home


For over 150 years the primary input method for modern tech has been modeled after the Victorian era typewriter. We still tap at skeuomorphic representations of physical keys on a purely digital interface. But does this make sense for the future of interface design, particularly in the home?
How do we design an interface for the future? GUI’s are here to stay, but I believe they will do so in limited capacity and exist second to voice. A visual interface will serve as a bridge to CUI’s (conversational user interfaces) just as skeuomorphism was necessary to transition people from dial pads to touch screens.
More and more we’re seeing the rise in smart home appliances. This includes light bulbs, shades, sound systems, security cameras, door locks, sensors, and many others. Yet these devices each require a different app where you tap through a series of menus and options just to turn something on or off. The old GUI model is failing.
But it’s the future! Which means telling your home to wake you up at 7am and open the blinds on the non-sunny side of the room while getting your coffee started and the TV set to the morning news shouldn’t have to involve you flipping through 4 apps and countless steps. You should just say it before you go to sleep and the house effortlessly remembers to do it.

From a user interface perspective, your voice is practically invisible and has minimal learning curve. Good user interface designs of the future will inherently eliminate as much of the learning curve as possible by leveraging behaviors that users are already accustomed to. A good CUI will backload all the heavy lifting of tapping through menus, selecting options, and creating rules by understanding natural language, context, and user intent.
So here’s the fun part where we can indulge in the endless possibilities of what’s next. Let’s explore some exciting things of what you can do with a smart home now and in the near future:

For over 150 years the primary input method for modern tech has been modeled after the Victorian era typewriter. We still tap at skeuomorphic representations of physical keys on a purely digital interface. But does this make sense for the future of interface design, particularly in the home?
How do we design an interface for the future? GUI’s are here to stay, but I believe they will do so in limited capacity and exist second to voice. A visual interface will serve as a bridge to CUI’s (conversational user interfaces) just as skeuomorphism was necessary to transition people from dial pads to touch screens.
More and more we’re seeing the rise in smart home appliances. This includes light bulbs, shades, sound systems, security cameras, door locks, sensors, and many others. Yet these devices each require a different app where you tap through a series of menus and options just to turn something on or off. The old GUI model is failing.
But it’s the future! Which means telling your home to wake you up at 7am and open the blinds on the non-sunny side of the room while getting your coffee started and the TV set to the morning news shouldn’t have to involve you flipping through 4 apps and countless steps. You should just say it before you go to sleep and the house effortlessly remembers to do it.

From a user interface perspective, your voice is practically invisible and has minimal learning curve. Good user interface designs of the future will inherently eliminate as much of the learning curve as possible by leveraging behaviors that users are already accustomed to. A good CUI will backload all the heavy lifting of tapping through menus, selecting options, and creating rules by understanding natural language, context, and user intent.
So here’s the fun part where we can indulge in the endless possibilities of what’s next. Let’s explore some exciting things of what you can do with a smart home now and in the near future:
For over 150 years the primary input method for modern tech has been modeled after the Victorian era typewriter. We still tap at skeuomorphic representations of physical keys on a purely digital interface. But does this make sense for the future of interface design, particularly in the home?
How do we design an interface for the future? GUI’s are here to stay, but I believe they will do so in limited capacity and exist second to voice. A visual interface will serve as a bridge to CUI’s (conversational user interfaces) just as skeuomorphism was necessary to transition people from dial pads to touch screens.
More and more we’re seeing the rise in smart home appliances. This includes light bulbs, shades, sound systems, security cameras, door locks, sensors, and many others. Yet these devices each require a different app where you tap through a series of menus and options just to turn something on or off. The old GUI model is failing.
But it’s the future! Which means telling your home to wake you up at 7am and open the blinds on the non-sunny side of the room while getting your coffee started and the TV set to the morning news shouldn’t have to involve you flipping through 4 apps and countless steps. You should just say it before you go to sleep and the house effortlessly remembers to do it.

From a user interface perspective, your voice is practically invisible and has minimal learning curve. Good user interface designs of the future will inherently eliminate as much of the learning curve as possible by leveraging behaviors that users are already accustomed to. A good CUI will backload all the heavy lifting of tapping through menus, selecting options, and creating rules by understanding natural language, context, and user intent.
So here’s the fun part where we can indulge in the endless possibilities of what’s next. Let’s explore some exciting things of what you can do with a smart home now and in the near future:

Você também vai gostar: